New PC-3000 Update, Some Irregularities

Hello,
Has anyone noticed some irregularities in new PC-3000 Samsung Module ?
I have this case of Samsung 1TB (ST1000LM024), that came in for recovery. I checked with the latest PC-3000 version and got full ID, it took almost 5 minutes to complete loading the Drive's details on Log, No sector access and couldn't even do a backup of resources. I tried doing a Head test, only H0 was fine. So I concluded the was Head bad, I informed the client and give a quote, the client accepted.
When I got the donor, I do a backup and preparing to do a replace the Head. Just to have a last check of the Patient's Drive, I plugged it back to PC3000 (Now the old one) because the new one is busy, to my greatest surprise, I found out the drive is responding well, got sector access and was able to get 98% clone of the Drive. Data was fully recovered without replacing the Head. So I got curious and return patient's drive to the new PC3000 and still got the same odd result no sector access and report all heads to be bad except H0.
 
Do you have problems with that ? And if you don't have anything good to say why not save yourself the stress..
I expect you to mind what you write in Forum base on your status "Data Recovery Authority".
 

jol

Member
Bankole Oladoja":188ank44 said:
Do you have problems with that ?
not at all, I'm very happy for you
Bankole Oladoja":188ank44 said:
And if you don't have anything good to say why not save yourself the stress..
will consider it
Bankole Oladoja":188ank44 said:
I expect you to mind what you write in Forum base on your status "Data Recovery Authority".
Oh, about that you'll need to speak to the admin (@Jared) of this site, who have decided the way of ranking
for me it can be even DR noob
I dont care
 

Jared

Administrator
Staff member
jol":i5wq1p5d said:
[post]8598[/post]
Oh, about that you'll need to speak to the admin (@Jared) of this site, who have decided the way of ranking
for me it can be even DR noob

You're right, I haven't visited the ranking for a while now. I'll need to update the number of posts required to reach those levels now that the forum has been around longer. Definitely some who've made it to ranks they don't need to have. :lol:
 

Blizzard

Member
Jared":19ycbwie said:
There, I adjusted the ranks to be more accurate. :D
Now yours is the only accurate one. Need to replace "Data Recovery" with "Forum" on the rest of them :)
Forum Noob
Forum Novice
Experienced Forum User?
Forum Pro
 

Jared

Administrator
Staff member
While you are right about that, I've got SEO reasons why I want the "data recovery" keyword on every page of this site. That way Google knows how to properly categorize it as a "data recovery forum".
 
Top