A few months ago, I noticed that my poker study routine had become rather chaotic. I was watching strategy videos, reading discussions, and reviewing individual hands, but I rarely had a clear idea of which weaknesses were actually having the biggest impact on my results. I decided that a proper database analysis could give me a more objective picture, so I prepared my hand history and chose a review format that seemed appropriate for my limits and game type. What I liked from the beginning was that the analysis was based on my own play rather than on theoretical examples that might have little connection with the situations I regularly face. The review highlighted several patterns that I had completely missed when looking at individual sessions. Some issues were related to preflop decisions, while others appeared in postflop spots where my lines seemed reasonable at first but were not particularly efficient. I found the explanations useful because they connected each mistake with its effect on EV instead of simply labeling a decision as right or wrong. I also started using a poker chart hands as an additional reference when checking whether my preflop choices were consistent with the ranges I was trying to follow. When researching where to order a review, I came across
Baseanalise, which focuses on played hands, database analysis, and personalized recommendations. Another useful part was the possibility of discussing questions after the review. I prepared several examples from the report and asked how I should approach similar situations in future sessions, which helped me understand the reasoning behind the recommendations instead of simply memorizing particular actions. After that, I changed the way I study poker. Rather than jumping between unrelated topics, I now concentrate on weaknesses found in my own database and periodically check whether I am actually correcting them. For me, this made the entire learning process much more organized and gave me a clearer understanding of where my study time should go.